Skip to Content

Discrete Cohesive zone Models

Yuval Freed's picture

I would like to add a comment on the interesting lecture of Dr. Kim Parnell from yesterday:

If we are looking at the stiffness matrix of cohesive elements, off-diagonal terms may appear in it. These terms represent the interaction between the different degrees of freedom of the interface element and are the outcome of its continuum nature. However, the off-diagonal terms sometimes result in numerical difficulties. To overcome this problem, the group of Prof. Tony Waas (from Univ. of Michigan) introduced a discrete cohesive zone model (DCZM) and a suitable element in which the stiffness matrix is sparse. This results from the fact that in the DCZM elements, the direct nodal displacement values are used in the traction separation laws, rather than the interpolated values as in the continuum framework used here.

I recommand to look at the following references (among many others of this group):

Xie D., Salvi AG., Sun C., Waas AM. and Caliskan A. Discrete cohesive zone model to simulate static fracture in 2D triaxially braided carbon fiber composites. Journal of Composite Materials,
40: 2025-2046, 2006.

Xie D. and Waas AM. Discrete cohesive zone model for mixed-mode fracture using finite element analysis. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 73: 1783-1796, 2006.

Discrete Cohesive Zone Models

Kim Parnell's picture

Thanks for your comments and the references. I want to look at the references and then maybe we can discuss it further.

When you say that the stiffness matrix for the element is sparse, are you saying it is diagonal? A typical continuum element will have a fully populated element stiffness matrix.

Do you have insights on why the off-diagonal terms cause numerical difficulties?

Regards,
Kim

-----------------
T. Kim Parnell, Ph.D.,P.E.
PEC - Parnell Engineering and Consulting
Sunnyvale, CA 94087
E-mail: kim.parnell@stanfordalumni.org
http://www.parnell-eng.com
http://www.linkedin.com/in/parnellpec
Skype: kim.parnell_msc